DNS recommendations - the paper
- Previous message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
- Next message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Nov 24 22:44:42 CET 1998
> * In the NS record section - the phrase: "There should be at least two > of them for every zone," should be updated by: "There need not to be > more than six servers for a zone". we may have a human language problem here. "need not be" means "is allowed but is not required." > * In the MX section, add the following after " ... a lot of trouble.": > "Furthermore, it is forbidden by the current RFC documents". and eliminate the stuff about trouble. > * The PTR section contains a possible mistake - are you sure you can write: >>> 123.45.67.8 IN PTR mail.cust.com. yes, but only in the in-addr.arpa. zone does it have useful meaning. randy
- Previous message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
- Next message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]