2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Dixon
jdd at vbc.net
Wed Jan 22 11:22:49 CET 1997
On Wed, 22 Jan 1997, Ian Mason wrote: > At 13:08 20/01/97 +0000, Keith N Mitchell wrote: > > I don't think there are any sacred cows for any of these here - > > if we adjust the LINX policy to meet requirements of the root NS > > rather than the other way around, I don't think we break either > > of 1 or 2. I don't think it breaks 3. either, but this requirement > > will go away when we have a route server in any case. > > If we opt for the root NS to have its own AS then there is no barrier to > people offering identical routing policy for the LINX and the NS. If it > shares the LINX AS then it will be impossible to have different policy for > LINX and the NS. Why is that? Different prefixes in the same AS can be treated differently. > So, if there is a possibility that there will ever be a > requirement to have different routing policy for the NS and the LINX it > would seem wise to give the NS its own AS. -- Jim Dixon VBCnet GB Ltd http://www.vbc.net tel +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015
- Previous message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]