[ncc-services-wg] [db-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [db-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V34
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Tue Apr 25 08:15:36 CEST 2006
Change of plan: see below. On 20 Apr 2006, at 20:43, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > On 20 Apr 2006, at 06:09, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > >> Niall O'Reilly wrote: >>> On 19 Apr 2006, at 15:08, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: >> Option 3 >>>> Z. AOB >>> I'm not sure whether this is within scope, or >> Option 1 >>> better mentioned in the NCC-services WG, >> Option 2 >>> or just simply discussed over coffee with an NCC person. >>> >>> A colleague in a sister organization here in Ireland has recently >>> had >>> an experience which leads me to think that it would be useful to >>> have >>> some consistency checking between address assignments and the >>> corresponding IN-ADDR.ARPA domains, at least at the /16 level. >>> See you all next week. >>> /Niall >> Let us try to do (2) first, then maybe (1), both before Friday >> morning. >> Then we can still do (3) and try to bring it up in DB under AOB. >> Wilfried. > > Thanks, Wilfried. That sounds like a plan. Conversations with a number of people here at RIPE 52, including some WG-co-chairs and some NCC experts, lead me to believe that this episode doesn't, on its own, indicate a sufficiently broad class of problems to warrant action. We should probably review the position if similar problems arise in the future. We don't need to take meeting time for this. /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [db-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V34
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]