[db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Havard Eidnes
he at uninett.no
Thu Feb 17 11:17:22 CET 2005
> > My view. It is valid to add the abuse mailbox to objects that describe > > Prrsons or Groups of them (person:, role:, organisation:), but to > > implement a reference to them for objects that describe ressources > > (inetnum, inet6num, route, ....). 'abuse-c:' for example. > > Agreed. Note that this "reference" is irt-mnt. It's annoying that > requests to have IRT records returned by default have been ignored. I do > not remember anybody arguing against this, and without this IRT records > are just dead. Seconded. Why was this request ignored? Regards, - Håvard
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]