[db-wg] abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Fri Jan 9 15:04:52 CET 2004
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Rev Adrian Kennard wrote: > |>A lot of inetnum records I have seen have a remarks field identifying > |>the abuse ocntact, but this is in an inconsistent format making it > |>difficult to automate in any way. It also seems that a lot of network > |>administrators (admin-c) do not feel they should administer their > |>network to remove viruses, etc, and get quite annoyed when contacted > |>regarding abuse. > |> > |>What would be the procedure for proposing such a new field? > | > | > | It's already there :). > | > | Please check > | http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/irt-object.html > | > | and the TF-CSIRT effort to make it easier to use this: > | http://www.dfn-cert.de/team/matho/irt-object/ > | > | It's not perfect but it's there. > > I did look at the IRT object, but it looked far far more complex than > the simple requirement of "who do I email abuse to for an IP address", > which is what the "remarks" fields ina lot of inetnum objects are > providing. Ditto. I haven't bothered with an irt object either. That is also why there are only 40 irt objects in the RIPE DB. -Hank > > Indeed, I am somewhat concerned by the "Creation procedure" which looks > overly complex and a manual process.
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]