[db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Thu Jan 8 19:43:17 CET 2004
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Mally Mclane wrote: Very strange that Eudora came in 5th in Appendix B1.1 and 4th according to B1.2 but didn't warrant a test vs. Lotus, Mozilla, The Bat, and Mulberry that came out below Eudora but did warrant a test. Stranger is that section 7 shows that Eudora was tested but in section 4 I can't find any Eudora results. -Hank > Hi Denis, > > --On 08 January 2004 17:46 +0100 Denis Walker <denis at ripe.net> wrote: > > > The results of this study can be found on our web site at: > > > > http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub- services/db/mail_client_tests.html > > It seems you didn't test Microsoft Outlook, just Outlook Express? As these > are two very different products, was there a reason for this, just I would > have thought Microsoft Outlook would have been very widely used... > > > Rgds, > > > Mally Mclane > JANET-CERT >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]