[db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Draft Minutes for DB-WG Ripe 47
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
TAYON, Julien
julien.tayon at neuf.com
Mon Feb 9 16:13:22 CET 2004
MarcoH <mailto:marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:25:12PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: [...] > > To provide such a behaviour, we need to store the information somewhere in > the database and free-form remarks or a more generic e-mail attribute is > IMHO not the way. I have been caught in a story of alledged spam with an end-user customer and my experience is that ISP abuse team is at the crossroad between - lawyer (commercial and penal one), - wannabe hacker (coders with good programming skills and poor comprehension of the universe ;) - end-user customer that want bad guy punished and their mails delivered (especially the unsollicited one they send), - anti and pro spam lobby wich abhores one another What I understood is abuse / IP problems are mostly resolved if you teach / inform / communicate correctly. As the situation is already quite confusing and complicated I definitively want a Keep It Simple Stupid solution. IMHO abuse-c: field wich is a valid email is Simple & Stutid (aka what I need) : as a proof of concept I can successfully "sell" it today in my company to the marketing department :) Regards, Julien Tayon 9T -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040209/f0f30b31/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Draft Minutes for DB-WG Ripe 47
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]