[db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Sat Feb 7 17:04:35 CET 2004
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:33:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 06, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > >operators, as we're paying the bills and supposedly ncc is > >our service org. and perhaps we should reward clue. > My requirements as an operator[1] are already fulfilled by irt objects, > can you explain better what are yours? My requirements as an operator[2] are clearly not met, I get loads of abuse complaints to my notify and changed addresses every week, which I have to forward to either the abuse dept or /dev/null. MarcoH [2] operator as in maintaining our database entries which is part of running an LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]