[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Feb 6 16:09:06 CET 2004
Absolutely! That was Ulrich's idea: once the person/role/mntner can carry what we need, discard the more cumbersome irt object. Niall On 6 Feb 2004, at 14:33, Randy Bush wrote: > why not remove irt entirely? it is not needed given this proposal. > > "less is more." -- mies van der rohe > > randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]