[db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at ripe.net
Thu Sep 4 09:51:13 CEST 2003
On 2003-09-04 09:22:56 +0200, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: > Hi, > > One thing (too early to think about all at once) > > >If we agree on this more generic solution, we could extend this > >behavior to other Objects that can be referenced as well. > >e.g. for mntner: itself. this would be a way tho prevent anyone > >from putting my mntner ont oan object. (This would solve the issue > >discussed in the context of the IRT Object - where the mntner of > >the object should be a proof of authenticity as well) > > This idea is good by means of consistency, BUT it would be weaker > than the auth: in the IRT, because there are only PGP keys allowed, > whereas in a mntner anything is possible. Actually, you can use any "auth:" type in the IRT (even NONE!!!). But don't do that. :-/ -- Shane Kerr RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]