[db-wg] RE: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Updated proposal for clean-up of references by name
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RE: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
adrian.pauling at bt.com
adrian.pauling at bt.com
Wed Jan 15 10:51:02 CET 2003
we have 'inet6num' objects separate to 'inetnum' to distinguish IPv6 address assignments from IPv4. Is the question should different 'peering-set' 'route' objects etc reflect different peerings for IPv6 from IPv4 that an assigned AS can have? This scenario is real as I can easily give a current (enterprise LIR) example. Regards, Adrian F Pauling BT Ignite Solutions
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Updated proposal for clean-up of references by name
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RE: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]