[db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sanjaya
sanjaya at apnic.net
Fri Aug 29 00:20:17 CEST 2003
> > While we understand the need for strict naming convention > > to avoid name disputes, may I request that the rules and > > convention will not be hard coded in the software but put > > in a customisable config file. > > As a user of RIPE's whois software, APNIC might want to have > > a slightly different naming convention & rules :-) > > It should be fairly straightforward to modify the rules. > However, without seeing specific requirements it is hard > to be certain! ;) Thanks Shane, we can discuss the specific requirements off the list, and we'd be happy to be involved in the design & development of the code. > This is indeed our thinking, or something very similar. > However, we want to do one step at a time. We would like to add the > organisation object first, and then introduce a new "status:" attribute and > inetnum template to include a new reference to responsible organisation(s). > > I think this is especially important given the input from the > community that we need to make these changes as useful as possible to > the users. > Getting a 10 page proposal with 3 or 4 big changes makes it > difficult to see the important details, at least for me. :) I see your point. No worries, we can discuss this later. We're quite happy with the proposal as it is :-) Cheers, Sanjaya
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]