RIPE-26, DB-WG, Proposed Agenda, 2nd Draft
- Previous message (by thread): RIPE-26, DB-WG, Proposed Agenda, 2nd Draft
- Next message (by thread): hierarchical route objects, part 1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geert Jan de Groot
GeertJan.deGroot at ripe.net
Wed Jan 15 21:04:45 CET 1997
On Wed, 15 Jan 1997 10:41:07 -0800 (PST) davidk at isi.edu wrote: > > > - loc-string: <LocatianString> > > The DNS LOC RR is defined in RFC1876. > Thanks. It seems that I now have two pointers (somebody at the 6bone list > gave me a pointer to RFC1712) to two different RFCs that do something > simular but not exactly the same :-(. However, it looks like RFC1876 is a > better choice ... Actually, I stole what I found in an RPS draft, hoping that it would be compatible with other developments. However, the draft involved is gone and I don't see this listed in the latest RPS draft. I guess we should pick one of the 'existing' standards and stick with it. This is yet another good reason not to refer to stuff in internet-drafts.. Geert Jan
- Previous message (by thread): RIPE-26, DB-WG, Proposed Agenda, 2nd Draft
- Next message (by thread): hierarchical route objects, part 1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]