hierarchical route objects, part 1
- Previous message (by thread): hierarchical route objects, part 1
- Next message (by thread): hierarchical route objects, part 1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cengiz Alaettinoglu
cengiz at ISI.EDU
Thu Jan 9 18:25:34 CET 1997
Gabor, For a second lets assume that all the address registries did maintainer delegation. It still does not work. Gabor Kiss (kissg at sztaki.hu) on January 9: > This can be prevented by this object > route: 0.0.0.0/0 > descr: for authorisation purposes > origin: AS0 > mnt-lower: MAINT-INTERNIC > etc. > > Internic (or whatever else) may delegate maintainer rights as well > as allocates address ranges. Say, I have 128.8/16, internic delegates me as the maintainer. You have 128.9/16 and are delegated for it. Foo aggregates 128.9/16 and 128.8/16 into 128.8/15. But no entity allocated 128.8/15, so foo is not delegated as the maintainer. You and I can not delegate foo either since aggregation is a local foo matter. 0.0.0.0/0 route object will prevent foo from registering 128.8/15. Cengiz -- Cengiz Alaettinoglu Information Sciences Institute (310) 822-1511 University of Southern California http://www.isi.edu/~cengiz
- Previous message (by thread): hierarchical route objects, part 1
- Next message (by thread): hierarchical route objects, part 1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]