FYI: new 2.00 whois server runs now on port 4444
- Previous message (by thread): FYI: new 2.00 whois server runs now on port 4444
- Next message (by thread): FYI: new 2.00 whois server runs now on port 4444
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Curtis Villamizar
curtis at ans.net
Fri Jun 28 15:34:26 CEST 1996
In message <199606272053.AA03700 at zephyr.isi.edu>, Bill Manning writes: > > > > I thought we already have one: port 43 for whois services. > > > > We will put the production code on port 43 as soon as the code looks stable > > for a while. > > > > Please correct me if I missed your point. > > > > David K. > > > > I am sorry that I was not clear. I beleive that, even with a superset > of the whois protocol, this is no longer whois as defined and should > therefor apply for a new well-known port. > > Local conversations with several others here at IETF do not support > this view, so I expect that it (the view) will remain a minority > opinion. Its something I thought worth mentioning in passing... :) > > Of course experimental stuff can use any port for testing. > This, being a purely local matter can occur on any port the sysadmin > chooses. > > -- > --bill Bill, As long as the is backward compatibility no protocol has had to apply for a new port number when it was extended. Curtis
- Previous message (by thread): FYI: new 2.00 whois server runs now on port 4444
- Next message (by thread): FYI: new 2.00 whois server runs now on port 4444
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]