Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Next message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christian Panigl, ACOnet/UniVie +43 1 4065822-383
panigl at cc.univie.ac.at
Fri Jan 19 18:31:45 CET 1996
>Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 17:34:17 MET >From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <Wilfried.Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> > > I'm reluctant to let go of the well-established use of the country: > attribute. > > I'm looking forward to the time when we might have more flexible > selection criteria for the DB, and I think loosing country information > isn't a good idea. My idea was just because I think that it is already more important to which registry/provider a network belongs than to which country, unless you want to introduce Internet customs based on country borders ;-) Anyhow, of course it should be kept if there is any use for it ! But I don't think that introducing an additional provider *attribute* within the inetnum object will need the design-work for a provider *object* to be finished. The only thing that should be finished is the decision about the provider IDs which will be used as a DB key. Ok, let's finish this sidestep and find a solution for the country attribute. Regards Christian
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Next message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]