[cooperation-wg] IANA discussions: ENOG 7
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] consensus on the NTIA-IANA proposal
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Minutes of the Coop-WG meeting during RIPE 68 in Warsaw - Updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Roy
twolf.om at gmail.com
Thu Jun 5 14:02:35 CEST 2014
That makes more sense and much better phrased for the correct meaning. I thought that is what you meant but wanted to be sure. Thanks for the clarification Tim Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 5, 2014, at 14:35, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote: > >> On 5.06.14 10:57 , Tim Roy wrote: >> I would think that RIPE NCC would have an interest in DNS operations since it relates to the numbers. >> >>>> On Jun 5, 2014, at 12:32, Chris Buckridge <chrisb at ripe.net> wrote: >>>> ... >>>> - The RIPE NCC is not interested in DNS operations and should not be put under that umbrella. > > > Unfortunate choice of words. I assume what was intended was something > like "RIPE and RIPE NCC are not interested in the oversight of > maintenance of the DNS root zone." > > Of course the RIPE NCC is interested in DNS operations as we maintain > and serve reverse DNS. We also operate k.root-servers.net and provide > measurements and statistics about DNS. > > Daniel >
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] consensus on the NTIA-IANA proposal
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Minutes of the Coop-WG meeting during RIPE 68 in Warsaw - Updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]