[bcop] Community statement
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] Community statement
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] Community statement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 30 15:48:57 CEST 2016
Hi, > Thanks for coordinating this and making this statement at the closing > plenary session. Unfortunately the plenary didn't accept the statement as a community statement/resolution as-is. The good news is that the reason for that is that they wanted a stronger statement :) Ruediger Volk was the person stating that on the microphone during the plenary, and he offered to help improve the language. I talked to Hans Petter Holen about what to do next, and he suggested taking this to the ripe-list so we can get consensus there and still turn this into a community-wide supported statement, which I think is important. I suggest Ruediger and I work on the text and then take it straight to the ripe-list. Doing word-smithing first in BCOP and then on the ripe-list will probably double the work, and as the BCOP task force already had consensus on the old version I'd like to take this directly to the superset :-) Do you agree with this plan? Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/bcop/attachments/20160530/ce472f0e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] Community statement
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] Community statement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]