[bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill Armstrong
wrarmstrong at gmail.com
Thu May 22 00:13:25 CEST 2014
Thanks for the info Benno! With that also being a fledgling initiative, there is probably no harm in NANOG moving toward that same goal...Now, merging the documents and determining which best practice is in-fact BEST may become interesting, but that is a problem for the future. Bill On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Benno Overeinder <benno at nlnetlabs.nl>wrote: > Hi, > > With the last RIPE68 meeting, a BGP configuration BCOP proposal was > presented by Francios Contat, see > https://ripe68.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/bcop-tf/. > > In the slides, Francios explained their approach: get ISPs on board, > definitions, scenarios, good practices, etc. The presentation was a call > for interest for others to join. Next is to redefine goals, scope, etc., > such that it will become a manageable document. Work to obtain input, > review, collect comments will take place in the RIPE Routing Working Group. > > The document already available is in French, but Google translate does a > good job to obtain an English version. > > Best, > > Benno Overeinder > > > Op 21 mei 2014 om 17:35 heeft Bill Armstrong <wrarmstrong at gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > Ahoy There! > Over the last few months the NANOG BCOP committee has combed through the > NANOG and various other NOG/IETF-Ops mailing lists and have identified a > stack reoccurring or pressing questions and concerns which we are using as > seeds for our initial BCOP Appeals. One exceptionally frequent line of > questions tend to be rooted in what amounts to "eBGP 101/102"(how to turn > up and test a peer and potential pitfalls there-in). While there is already > a "Public Peering Exchange" BCOP and a draft for "IPv6 Peering" is in the > works, it appears that the fundamentals need to be captured and put on > display. Although there are already a handful of SMEs on-board, our goal is > to define the BEST practices so the more insight we can get into this > problem the better! If you are interested in acting as a SME for the "eBGP > Configuration BCOP" please let me know, this is your chance to sow your > expertise across the internet! > > THANKS! > Bill Armstrong > > P.S. > I'll be at NANOG 61 so if you aren't sure about the commitment or have > questions about the BCOP process don't hesitate to track me down for a chat! > > _______________________________________________ > > BCOP mailing list > BCOP at mailman.nanog.org > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/bcop/attachments/20140521/2d507f4f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]