[anti-abuse-wg] 196.52.0.0/14 revoked, cleanup efforts needed

Cynthia Revström via anti-abuse-wg wrote on 20/01/2021 13:40:
> First of all this mailing list is not intended to discuss individual 
> cases of abuse (especially ones not related to the RIPE NCC), but rather 
> to discuss and develop new methods for dealing with it in general.
> (Brian, please correct me if I am wrong here)
> 
> Nonetheless, while I certainly don't represent them, I believe RADb does 
> delete objects if you email them and can show proof that you are the 
> holder of that IP space.

there is a RIPE policy aspect to this, namely what to do with RIPE IRRDB 
objects of address space which is revoked by other RIRs.

In this specific situation, there are a bunch of route: entries in the 
RIPE-NONAUTH DB, and maybe it would be good for the DBWG to have a think 
about this?

http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/196.52.0.0/16
http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/196.53.0.0/16
http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/196.54.0.0/16
http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/196.55.0.0/16

Ostap, can you bring this up on DB-WG?

Nick