[anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Thu Jan 16 17:02:03 CET 2020
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 03:36:46PM +0000, Marcolla, Sara Veronica wrote: >Alex, > >You say âthey just feel this issue should be address via leveraging RIPE resoucesâ, but I do not see so far any concrete proposal in the sense of addressing issues, only shooting down proposals (for good or bad reasons, I am not entering into the merit here) one after the other. Letâs leverage any resource, but at the same letâs solve the problems â without deflecting the attention with every message. Please show where, in ripe-710, it says that proposals pursuing a "noble goal" should be exempt from discussion and opposition. Kind Regards, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]