[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Autonomous System Numbers
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Autonomous System Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Autonomous System Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Tue Nov 4 20:16:44 CET 2014
In message <5458EB47.5000901 at heanet.ie>, you wrote: >Ronald, > >I've raised this with the NCC and asked them to prepare an answer to >these questions as I feel they fall within their purview. > >Hopefully they will be able to get back to you soon. > >Brian >Ronald F. Guilmette wrote, On 01/11/2014 03:52: >> A few questions, if you don't mind... >> >> Given some arbitrary record which is stored within the RIPE WHOIS >> data base, such as an organization (ORG-*) record or a record for >> a number resource, such as an AS, how can I determine the date on >> which that record was created? Do I just look for the earliest >> date found in any of the associated changed: fields? Just to make sure I'm clear... No one on this list knows the answer, even to the above trivial question? >> Give an AS number, issued within the RIPE region, how can I find >> the identity of the associated LIR? Is the identity of the >> associated LIR provided by the sponsoring-org: field of the >> WHOIS record for the AS? Same again. I am rather astonished that not a single person within a group focused on dealing with network abuse issues within the RIPE region can even say how to find the LIR that issued a given AS. Does no one, other than me, ever even get curious about such things? >> What sorts of credentials or bona fides must or should applicants >> who are requesting AS number allocations provide to the RIPE LIR >> which processes the request(s)? Same comments as above. >> Has any AS number allocation, issued within the RIPE region, ever >> been revoked without the consent of the registrant of that allocation? >> If so, which ones? And in those cases, what policies and/or procedures >> were used or followed during the revocation process? Are these >> policies and/or procedures written down someplace, or are they entirely >> ad hoc? Someone did write to me, off-list, with a semi-response to the above, informing me that ``details'' of RIPE investigations are non-public. I should probably have clarified that I wasn't asking for any specific details about any specific case. I asked, in the first instance, if any AS allocation had ever been revoked. That's a yes/no question, and one which I thought would have been easy to answer, particularly by members of a group focused on network abuse issues. But if all of these questions can only be answered by the NCC, then I guess that's the way it is, and I thank you for forwarding my queries to them.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Autonomous System Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Autonomous System Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]