[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) - addtional needs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Nov 23 18:19:59 CET 2011
it is an interesting question, followed by the 'what is ripe to do in cases where is requirement isnt complied with, or where it is fraudulent' question --srs (iPad) On 23-Nov-2011, at 20:18, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: > Hi, > > The proposed policy text includes: > > "The role objects used for abuse contact information will be required to contain a single "abuse-mailbox:" attribute which is intended for receiving automatic and manual reports about abusive behavior originating the resource holders' networks." > > Do the proposers intend the requirement for the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute to be enforced in any way and if so, how? > > Thanks, > > Leo >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) - addtional needs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]