[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Feb 1 17:16:59 CET 2011
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Dave CROCKER <dcrocker at bbiw.net> wrote: > But note that Richard's note contained none of these particulars. I read it in the context of earlier articles he posted here and elsewhere such as on the spamhaus website. And also in the context of http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=RIPE [and in advance to those that would like to point it out - yes please, I know ripe isnt an isp, and I guess so does richard] -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]