[anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal: Place for Abuse Contact Information
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal: Place for Abuse Contact Information
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Sep 30 14:16:51 CEST 2010
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Tobias Knecht wrote: Just few comments. > Currently within the RIPE region, the biggest problem for network > operators is to know the best place to publish abuse contact > information. (IRT, abuse-mailbox, remark-fields, and in addition to > that, in which object they should publish them?) On the other hand > abuse reporting parties having a huge problem by finding a correct > abuse contact in the variety of possibilities. > > Since there is a specialized object (IRT) for abuse contacts, this > should be mandatory, to stop the uncontrolled growth. Your arguments could be summarize like that: "there is a mess". Making irt object mandatory has nothing to do with cleaning it up. Yet, I do think that making it the only place of putting "abuse contact" is ok. > 4.3 Delete abuse-mailbox fields in all objects that do not define an > IRT, and delete the trouble field everywhere until end of 2012. I don't agree to delete the trouble field everywhere since those are in remarks right now and remarks are just free text remarks. ;-) > - Networks will be able to supply their own, direct contact > information for abuse departments. They are able to do that right now. Nothing new. > - Abuse complaints will not be sent to the "wrong" contact any > more. Ekhm. Don't take me wrong. I know only one well known organization which sends me abuse complaints using wrong data. It is abusix.org. And I do have proper contact information put in person/role/inetnum/aut-num objects for all of my customers and I do a regular cleanup and updates. > 5.2 Disadvantages > > - No disadvantages are foreseen. A lot of work for LIR staff. > 7. Effect on NIRs > ------------------ > > It would be of benefit to the whole Internet community if NIRs were to > implement a similar abuse contact scheme in their whois databases. But > this would be another proposal. Do we have NIRs in RIPE region?? ;-) Best regards, Piotr Strzyżewski -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal: Place for Abuse Contact Information
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]