[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Wed Nov 10 13:12:22 CET 2010
Hi, >>> And how anybody could stop publishing this kind of info in remark >>> fields? >> >> Unfortunately you can't. But if everybody knows that the mandatory IRT > > Everybody? Stop joking. :) Every single regular not-technical user who > heard about whois on facebook forum? Sorry. That was to broadly. ;-) Everybody meant, every RIPE member and everybody who wants to use abuse contact information for serious reporting or work. >> is the place to publish abuse contact information, nobody will look for >> remark fields any further. And if you have to have an IRT, why publish a >> remark field with the same information? > > Since we are not going to delete that, there is huge change to have a > lot of such remarks fields. If there are ways to delete remark fields containing abuse@ addresses, we can do that, but I guess we will not catch stuff like remark: Please send complaints about spam to remark: abuse at domain.tld in an appropriate way. Thanks, Tobias abusix.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101110/d90a4b8a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]