[anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Brian Nisbet brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Thu Dec 23 12:35:45 CET 2010
"Thor Kottelin" wrote the following on 23/12/2010 07:59: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- >> admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette >> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:00 AM >> To:<anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> > >> In message<97C58E22-A243-4A57-9602-7184B5D3522A at blacknight.ie>, >> "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight"<michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: > >>> Instead of simply stating that they are alerting >> us to an >>> issue they start off with a long convoluted text about their >> trademarks, w >>> hich is totally irrelevant to us. > >> You're right. I think the way that people in the news business >> commonly >> express the point you just made is that it is bad practice to "bury >> the >> lead", i.e. its important to express the major point you are trying >> to >> make (in a news story or in an abuse report) clearly, concisely, >> and in >> the first sentence. > > What was the "Subject:" line of the takedown request? > > (My apologies if it was already mentioned. The archive at > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2010/ seems to be > broken. "Archive Last Changed: 01 December 2010 17:58 CET") The lovely people in the NCC tell me this should now be fixed. Brian.