[address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Mon Mar 27 13:02:27 CEST 2017
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 01:46:32AM +0200, Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote: >What's the calculated gain, what's the overall benefit, given >the limited control (see above)? It's fine that the process is >automated on RIPE NCC's end, but LIRs will face additional work. >With now 32 bits at hand for AS numbers, what's the operational >benefit for the RIPE community as a whole if all "invisible" >6,6k ASNs would be returned after this effort? Especially as RFC >4893 is celebrating it's 10th birthday in a few weeks? I think this is a misunderstanding. The goal is not to reclaim "unused" ASNs, AIUI it is to re-establish contact with ASNs lost in the "swamp" over time. Any reclamations would presumably be incidental. It's just the NCC doing its job as a registry. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]