[address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Mon Sep 15 20:59:36 CEST 2014
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > Hi Scott, > > > Who determines whether consensus on a new chair has been reached? > > It are the working group chairs that determine consensus. If a chair is > personally involved (whether it is a policy discussion or something like > this) then he/she usually abstains and leaves the determining of consensus > to the other chair. If someone objects to a consensus decision then this > can be discussed in the WG or appealed following > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-614. > > > If a vocal minority objects to replacing the current chair and blocks > consensus on a new one, does that mean he could continue chairing the WG > indefinitely? > > Consensus is based on discussion. The minority would need good arguments > to oppose the change. And if the worst happens there is always the appeals > procedure, but I hope we'll never reach that point over who gets to do the > work of being a chair :) > Ok, that's good enough for me. Support. -Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140915/a508b69c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]