[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Thu Oct 16 15:08:24 CEST 2014
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) <d.baeza at tvt-datos.es> wrote: > Easy. The current IPv6 deploy makes me cry like a little girl. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjJQBjWYDTs > NOBODY (as > percentage) is deploying it in their customer/backone/whatever network. This is not true. > If we want to migrate from v4 to v6, some drastic changes should be made. Like only handing out /22 any more? > One of them, requiring the v6 to be publicly visible if you want to have the > last /22. This is not something that will drive v6 adoption. It's laughably easy to get around this requirement. For Gert's benefit: I am fine with removing and/or softening this requirement. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]