[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Oct 10 21:20:59 CEST 2014
Hi, On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:40:03PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > The proposal as it stands is window dressing because it requires only > tickbox-style compliance. This is completely pointless. Organisations > will either deploy ipv6 or they won't, and this decision will be made on > business merit rather than because a RIPE NCC IPRA delayed a /22 allocation > because of a policy violation. Indeed, but that's what we have in the policy right *now* :-) So maybe the question to the group should be: - abandon the IPv6 requirement completely, and "who asks for their last /22 gets it, done" or - come to some agreement about what sort of IPv6 window dressing should be there, maybe only to serve as an awareness thing. - *iff* that, what sort of IPv6 space should qualify? Onlookers might have noticed that this proposal should have ended it's current phase (discussion) quite a while ago, was extended, and should have ended now again - but we'll extend the discussion phase again, to clarify this point. Then the proposers have a clear direction in which way to re-word their proposal for the next discussion phase - the current text certainly hasn't reached consensus yet. So, working group, please let us know what you think. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141010/56ae3a1a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]