[address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Sat Jun 7 11:33:26 CEST 2014
Just as a heads-up: On 06.06.2014 00:58, Scott Leibrand wrote: > [...] Also: > > -Address space may only be re-allocated to another LIR that is a member > of an RIR that allows transfers. The block that is to be re-allocated > must not be smaller than the minimum allocation block size at the time > of re-allocation. > +Address space may only be re-allocated to another organization that is > a member of an RIR that allows transfers. The block that is to be > re-allocated must not be smaller than the minimum allocation block size > at the time of re-allocation. Given the support that 2014-01 has seen so far, you may want to think this paragraph without its second sentence; cf. items e) & f) of https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-01 - and see whether it still makes sense to you. Cheers, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]