[address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Jul 7 16:57:37 CEST 2014
Hi, On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:46:35PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > What happens if I > > * have LIR A > * create LIR B > * get LIR B's /22 > * sell LIR B's /22 to LIR A > * close down LIR B > * create LIR C... > > Under current regulations, this seems to be feasible and allowed. True. Maybe the issue is that the sum of (work+price tag) is not interesting enough compared to other avenues. Someone mentioned that /22s are not interesting for brokers ("too much work, too little money")... Just speculating. To be honest, I expected to see quite a bit of this, but it seems to be "not happening yet". I know that NCC RS is keeping an eye on the /22 burn rate, and I think we'll hear about any particular trends at the next RIPE meeting... Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140707/abe8a04e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]