[address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool

  W dniu 2014-07-03 00:22, Elvis Daniel Velea pisze:
>
>> I would say that it is only dangerous if you have never done business
>> before. You should never pay in advance for something that you have not
>> yet received. Various types of Escrow agreements or Bank Guarantee
>> Letters are used, usually, when an IPv4 allocation is transferred. These
>> are processes that do not involve the RIPE NCC but which make the
>> transfers happen. Brokers are happy to assist with these processes.

What do you say about situation: you bought, the transfers are made
successfully​​, you paid after transfers, and suddenly after 8-12 months
after transaction you see deletion and revert on the objects, because
RIPE says that they were sold by a cheater. RIPE is not trying to help,
they only said, that is because a due diligence process. My question is,
where was the due diligence *during* the transfer?

>> Any new LIR will receive a /22 allocation as long as they can justify
>> the use of at least one IP address. The policy is very simple in this
>> regard.

Again - this is not obvious. What about a situation that you are paying
for setting up a LIR and then you do not get allocation, even though you
show its need? And in the dispute you get the answer:
"By signing the RIPE NCC Standard Service Agreement you only become a
member. The membership fee covers the membership alone. Whether you
receive an IP allocation is being separately reviewed."

Regards

Tomasz Slaski