[address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Tue Feb 25 23:39:24 CET 2014
Dear Sergey, we were specifically debating the German PostIdent procedure - which is used by (almost?) all German direct/no branch offices/online banks. But AFAIK it is not restricted to German banks, non-German banks might be using it as well. As I am not sure about this - I do not have a non-German bank as an example at hand - I have put "German" in "()". Or shorter: security and trust lies with the process and provider of a service - and not with its users and/or customers. Best, -C. On 25.02.2014 23:16, Sergey Myasoedov wrote: > I can’t agree. > > On 25 Feb 2014, at 23:07, Carsten Schiefner > <ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de> wrote: > >> what Richard said: what is good enough for (German) banks to e.g. >> open an account, should be sufficient for the NCC as well, me >> thinks. > > in other words, what is good enough for > transistrian/lebanese/BVI/iranian/somalian banks - should be good > enough for the NCC? what data quality we are trying to achive?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]