[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 09:38:52 CET 2014
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) < d.baeza at tvt-datos.es> wrote: > At least Im not the only one saying IPv6 isnt really deployed. > I'm not saying it isn't really deployed, so if you counted me as some sort of support to your claim, you need to rethink that. > > As you all can see, Only a 5% of Google traffic is v6. > Did you look at the curve for the uptake of v6 traffic? You've been making theses "IPv6 isn't really deployed" claims for a pretty long time now. Meanwhile, IPv6 traffic at Google has more than tripled. Prediction: You'll be making the claim when IPv6 traffic is 10%, 20%, 40%, and even 50%. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141201/00b761de/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]