[address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Apr 23 15:05:04 CEST 2014
Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote: [...] > The reserved pool grew up from Mar 3 to Apr 7 from 1.58M to 2.29M (710k > IP Addr) and only from Apr 7 to Apr 21 (2 weeks) it grew in 0.05Millions > (50k Addrs) This is suggesting that we have a sort of a steady or predictable flow of addresses back into the pool. Unfortunately, this is not the case. According to the IANA List, we had addresses returned between 2012-05 and 2012-08, nothing at all in 2013(!) and now the bunch of TWD /24s from RIPE in 2014-04. Wilfried
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]