[address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Thu Apr 17 22:49:25 CEST 2014
Hi, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote: [...] > Soon we will get address space of around /10 from IANAs returned pool > plus the reserved we already have. I think I should clarify the policy and the contents of the pool because I don't want the RIPE or other communities to be surprised when the policy is implemented. The policy (https://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/global-addressing/allocation-ipv4 -post-exhaustion) requires us to split the contents of the pool into five equal parts and then round down to the nearest CIDR boundary. The pool (https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-recovered-address-space) currently has just short of five /10s, which means the size of the allocation units must be rounded down to /11 equivalents. This is based on the current contents of the pool. If the pool size grew by a precise amount then the policy would support the /10 equivalent allocation unit that has been mentioned. If that does not happen the contents of the pool are likely to be eked out in increasingly small allocations over a number of years. Kind regards, Leo Vegoda -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140417/bc891ac6/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5495 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140417/bc891ac6/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]