[address-policy-wg] report address policy violation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] report address policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Apr 8 21:41:13 CEST 2014
Hi, On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:34:10PM +0100, Tom Norda wrote: > I know a RIPE member with an unused ipv4 /20 block not used in the last > 2 years and i'm wondering if that's a RIPE community policy violation. I > checked https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/current-ripe-documents/ripe-policiesbut > i still have doubts if it is accepted or not. If it's an allocation, it's not a violation. There is no clause about returning allocations if you don't meet your growth estimates. gert -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140408/21930b2a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] report address policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]