[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Mon Sep 30 19:00:10 CEST 2013
* Nick Hilliard > On 30/09/2013 17:41, Tore Anderson wrote: >> Then you would have only one path and no confusion: >> >> RIR[RIPE NCC] -> LIR -> End User > > you would have confusion about who the address space holder was and what > the end user's rights and obligations were to the ripe ncc. If you're > going to suggest this, talk to the RIPE NCC legal eagles because it's a > difficult area. All existing PI holders would become simultaneously both the LIR *and* the End User in the above chain, so I'm not sure where this confusion would come from? It would essential be the same as if a current LIR assigns its entire allocation to itself (its own infrastructure) and has no external End Users. I have a feeling this already happens a quite a bit in IPv4 these days... Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]