[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Fri Sep 27 08:55:48 CEST 2013
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Richard Hartmann < richih.mailinglist at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Elvis Velea <elvis at velea.eu> wrote: > > > I do think that these terms do need to be defined, and the policy text > was > > the best place for the definitions (in my opinion). Where else would you > see > > them? > > Personally, I would like to see a single, canonical, authorative > document defining _all_ special terms. > > In a perfect world, those special terms would then be Always > Capitalized When Used Within Documents or MAYBE EVEN ALL UPPER CASE. > > > If there's any interest, I would be willing to spear-head and/or > collaborate on this effort. > As a reasonably fresh novice in this WG and the LIR game, I think that kind of document is an absolute necessity. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130927/20370baa/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]