[address-policy-wg] 2013-05 Last Call for Comments (No Restrictions on End User Assignments in Intra-RIR Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-05 Last Call for Comments (No Restrictions on End User Assignments in Intra-RIR Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Nov 1 19:09:26 CET 2013
Hi, On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:37:20PM +0100, Erik Bais wrote: > Having said that, I want to express my support for Sascha's proposal. Thanks. Just for clarity (because I got another inquiry by personal mail) - in Last Call, no further statements of support are formally required, that is, if not a single mail is received in Last Call phase, this is still considered by the PDP as "support" (based on the support in the previous phases) - "silence is consent", in and *only in* the Last Call phase. OTOH, if someone has a valid concern, answering that is welcome, of course :-) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 826 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20131101/cdfee2ba/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-05 Last Call for Comments (No Restrictions on End User Assignments in Intra-RIR Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]