[address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Mar 13 12:26:40 CET 2013
Hi, >>> "Such address space must not contain any block that is assigned to an >>> End User" >> Well, that's the "original" transfer policy - which compromised on >> "ok, we'll permit transfers, but only transfers of empty PA blocks!" > > what if the buyer has contracted to support the sub-allocation? The transfer policy explicitly says 'empty PA'. But in the case you describe it might be possible to do this through the mergers/acquisitions procedures because the buyer isn't buying address space but acquiring a part of a business. The NCC will probably look at such things case-by-case. And I might be wrong :-) Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]