[address-policy-wg] [members-discuss] other options to ? Reclaiming unused Ipv4 blocks

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:09:09AM +0100, "Mag. Matthias ?ubik" wrote:
[..]

Please do *not* cross-post between the members-discuss and address-policy-wg
mailing lists.

Charging scheme discussions should stay in members-discuss, as APWG
has no direct influence on the charging scheme.

Policy change discussions are welcome in the address-policy-wg list, but
should not cross-post to members-discuss, as that will fragment the 
discussion threads (some replies go to one of the lists, some go to the
other, noise level goes up).

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20131217/16305385/attachment.sig>