[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Mon Dec 9 23:59:35 CET 2013
* Sander Steffann > I think a formal request to the PDO is in order here: can the NCC > please make sure that links to mailing list archives are never > broken? There are too many external references to them. Besides, a > redirect from 'mail/archives/address-policy-wg' to > 'ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg' shouldn't be that hard to > implement ;-) On closer look, it's not the mailing list archive that changed, it's the way it's being linked to from the proposal's page: ?version=1: <a class="external-link" href="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html" target="_self" title="">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html</a> ?version=2: <a class="external-link" href="../../../mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html" target="_self" title="">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html</a> ?version=3: <a href="../../../../mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html</a> Somehow a few extraneous ".."s sneaked in the href of v2 and v3.... (?version=4 seems fixed now and uses an absolute URL. Thanks to whoever did that!) Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]