[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Wed Nov 7 21:37:47 CET 2012
On 2012-11-07 20:35, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 11/7/12 8:25 PM, Marcin Kuczera wrote: >> Both - Cisco/Ericsson(RedBack) - for their BRASes have not yet >> implemented this access method for IPv6.. >> They have it on roadmap, but it will take a while for first releases and >> much more before they will be stable enough to >> put them in production. > > Not true. Cisco ASR1k and Ericsson Redback works very well with > IPv6/IPv4 for access. Tested at least for PPPoE/A users. Jan, please - read it once again, I wrote that - I don't care abut PPPoE/A, *NO PPP* I need NATIVE ETHERNET - in RedBack the call it CLIPS - any hints about that ? Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]