[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
info at leadertelecom.ru
Wed Nov 7 11:38:12 CET 2012
Why not continue give PA-addresses in this case? Many customers need them too. We have to be consistent: 1. Continue distribute last /8 for PA & PI. OR 2. Don't distribute last /8 for PA & PI (except LIR which didn't get 1024 IPs from last /8). I think second option is more optimal, while some defficit and increasing prices for IPv4 allow customers run IPv6 faster. p.s. Who will PI-addresses? Why they can't rent them or start use IPv6? -- Alexey Ivanov 07.11.2012 14:24 - Nick Hilliard написал(а): On 07/11/2012 08:29, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: > Forget about PIv4. It is deprecated and we don't need it for now. You may not need it, but there are a lot of other end users in the RIPE service area who disagree and feel that they need it very badly. Nick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121107/838fa124/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]