[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Mon May 21 10:57:59 CEST 2012
On 7 May 2012, at 16:58, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 5/7/12 4:27 PM, Sergey Myasoedov wrote: >> >> Regarding using last /8 for PI assignments, this proposal looks fair to me. > > Agree. Lets distribute the leftovers and be done with this for good, so people could focus on important things (such as IPv6 deployment :) ) +1 At the current run-rate, how long would PI from the final /8 be available ? Is it considered desirable by the community to any space whatsoever of the final /8 for PA, so that new LIRs can form and be given any v4 for a period of time longer than the anticipated run rate ? My mind is not made up on the subject yet, though I am erring on the side of 'no' because after some consideration, I think that v6 is the only long-term answer, and that stalling tactics are all very interesting to discuss. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]