[address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Policy Proposal (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)

Thu May 10 17:14:56 CEST 2012

On 10 May 2012 14:39, Jan Ingvoldstad <frettled at gmail.com> wrote:
> If I understand the rationale correctly, the change essentially means that a
> LIR has more time to actually implement a use of a transferred block, than
> they have for a new block.
>
> I am a n00b at these matters, but I don't quite see why this is an important
> change, and why as much as 24 months is necessary.

24 months was the original time-period for networks to show their
networking requirements before the run-out fairly proposals were
introduced and it was an attempt to return to those number for
transfers rather than have lots of little ones...

J

-- 

James Blessing
07989 039 476