[address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Mar 29 14:36:16 CEST 2012
Hi, On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:29:16PM +0100, boggits wrote: > I thought I saw a lot of "we support this" emails (mostly from IX > operators), if not then I'll start with "I support this policy" Those were all in the initial discussion phase. I don't need a full repetition of all these, but a few statements of position in the review phase *are* helpful, to see whether people are still agreeing, even if the text has changed somewhat between v1.0 and v3.0 :-) By definition, in "Last Call", we have "silence is consent" but that's not true for the earlier phases. Thanks for your voice ;-) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]